Monday 13 December 2010

Theatre Review – Hamlet (Oliver Theatre @ the Royal National Theatre – 9th December 2010)

Hamlet represented my first professional Shakespeare production. And what a production to be the first! Rory Kinnear in Shakespeare’s most famous role at the Royal National Theatre! Excitement, as you can imagine, was high. Especially considering that the fact that I was seeing it on the same night that it was being beamed into 14 countries globally as part of the new “NT live!” scheme by the National Theatre, which sees some of its most popular productions being shown in cinemas worldwide.
The Oliver Theatre at the National was the perfect venue for this production, having a traditional theatrical feel (which just seems right for Shakespeare) mixed with a contemporary, experimental vibe, which, of course, was the essence of this production.
Directed by National Theatre artistic director Nicholas Hytner (famed director of Miss Saigon and The History Boys), this production is a modern re-imagining of the play. Set in the modern world (though in a non-specific place) Hamlet is still the prince of Denmark, his father the king still dies and is replaced by his uncle, but this time, there are modern costumes, sets and props, and CCTV cameras constantly spy on the public, following the characters wherever they go.
Hamlet follows the story of the Prince of Denmark who, after his father’s death is convinced that the king was in fact murdered by his uncle who ultimately became king and married Hamlet’s mother. Hamlet becomes infatuated with Ophelia, whose father is convinced that Hamlet is mad. The play follows Hamlet’s journey to avenge his father’s death, and the royal family’s journey to prove Hamlet’s insanity.
Rory Kinnear as Hamlet.

Hytner’s vision and idea is not terribly different to those of other Shakespeare directors who have come before him in the modern world, and some of those productions, indeed, worked better. Hytner has a great eye for movement. He has a great ear for music in dialogue, and he has a great knowledge and understanding of characters. But his relationship with his designer was the downfall of this production. Only a small downfall though it was, it meant that the audience couldn’t fully connect with the play – Hytner seemed to be stuck in two worlds. Part of him seemed to want to be modern and different, but it didn’t feel as if he quite escaped his traditionalist other half, who wanted to do things properly. Vicki Mortimer’s cumbersome, clunking design didn’t help either – a set that should have moved fluidly and freely with the title character turned out to be at worst an obstruction, at best, functional. It created a restricted view (which is hard to believe in a theatre like the Olivier) and just seemed to want to do so much more to aid the performers. The best thing I could say about the set is that it did manage to create a black-and-white image where everything looked the same. This could be interpreted as how Hamlet sees the world after his father’s death, how everyone is equally against him. How the world and its people are all the same, all as bad as each other.
Rory Kinnear’s interpretation of Hamlet was masterful, and more importantly memorable. It’s easy to take a performer in this role for granted when so many great actors have played the role over the years, but Kinnear’s interpretation is definitely fresh and unique. Kinnear wrings the play of its humour, adds much physical acting and farcical elements and immediately juxtaposes it with the serious thinking of a man filled with inner turmoil. Kinnear’s Hamlet is a personal character. There are elements that any person could relate to. Consequently, you feel yourself more drawn in to the character, you laugh with him, you cry with him, and you feel involved in his relationships with Ophelia and his mother amongst others. His immediate switch from funny to serious in one scene shows great natural comic time, Kinnear plays a rather camp-insane Hamlet – this works for his mental state, it blends well with the serious side of the character.
Two other cast highlights were Giles Terera as Horatio and Clare Higgins as Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother.
Terera and Kinnear played wonderfully off each other. The perfect level of angst and tension built up between them, you felt for both characters and understood the almost brotherly-love between the characters. They are there for each other from the start to the end – almost the only constant in each other’s lives.
From the start, we felt absolutely no compassion towards Gertrude whatsoever. A woman who marries her husband’s brother right after he dies? Not attractive. We are on Hamlet’s side, we want him to hate her, and she deserves it. Clare Higgins’ played this character well in that way. She created the stuck up cow that Gertrude appears to be, but she really showed off her real acting skills in her emotional tension-filled scenes with her son, being powerful yet showing a vulnerable side, a side that Hamlet knew how to get to. Higgins gave a strong, balanced performance, though it did seem apparent that she was battling a cold. Her voice frequently became hoarse, and therefore some of her lines were lost.
The supporting cast were also all strong; Patrick Malahide as Claudius, Alex Lanipekun as Laertes and David Calder as the Gravedigger to name but a few.
The only cast member that was slightly under-whelming was Ruth Negga’s Ophelia. A character that we’re supposed to see and sympathise with, understand her and her motives, the reasons for her insanity. But this wasn’t exactly clear in Negga’s interpretation. We didn’t really understand the reasons for some of Ophelia’s movement, insanity and reactions to other characters. She played the mad side of Ophelia very well, but her progression and dramatic arc throughout the play was not clear – the audience didn’t see Ophelia’s transition from one state to another as the play progressed.
Rory Kinnear as Hamlet and Ruth Negga as Ophelia.

The score of Hamlet, by Alex Baranowski is distinctly different to what we’re used to hearing in a theatre. With a more cinematic sound, Baranowski’s music is not limited to scene change, it represents characters in their entrance, and it underscores – even when sometimes we don’t notice it – to add spookiness to the piece. It works well in the theatrical scenes to accompany Hamlet’s play, and worked particularly well when characters were in motion. Baranowski’s tension filled score kept the audience on the edge of their seats and was well suited to Hamlet, both the character and the play.
The National Theatre is a fantastic venue, and it was great to see Hamlet whilst it was being broadcast through NT Live. However, there were sound issues with the production, mostly to do with the microphone balance of the actors. Under normal circumstances of course, this problem may not have existed, but at this particular performance, some actors appeared to have microphones, some didn’t. This was a huge mistake as the overall sound of the production was not balanced. Some actors seemed to have issues with projection (many of them sounded ill), some didn’t. However, the advisable thing would have been to have given everyone microphones or given no-one microphones. However, admittedly, these problems may have been unique to this performance due to the fact that it was being broadcast live.
Nicholas Hytner’s Hamlet is a fantastic production, superbly acted and alive with energy.
4*

Friday 10 December 2010

Theatre Review - The Sound of Music (Bristol Hippodrome, 29th November 2010)

Since it opened on Broadway in 1959, The Sound of Music has become arguably the most famous musical in the world. Through the iconic 1965 film adaptation with Julie Andrews, many successful revivals on Broadway and in the West-End (including the 1981 revival with Petula Clark) and the recent TV search to find the next Maria, The Sound of Music has permanently been part of Western popular culture for the last half-century. It was this search for Maria that found the star of this new production, which opened at the London Palladium in 2006, Connie Fisher. Andrew Lloyd-Webber’s new production has been, since last year, on tour, with Ms. Fisher still in the part.
Connie Fisher & The Children

Great things were expected of this production and this star and I saw it when it was over a year into its multi-million pound tour of the biggest venues of the UK. Multi-million pound? It must be said that this production looked anything but from the start. From the opening image of Connie Fisher on a polystyrene-looking mountain, I wasn’t exactly hooked. I was, instead, sat there thinking that I’d bought an over-priced ticket to a school production.
Soon though, everything changed. We were introduced to a fabulous motion sequence during I Have Confidence which showed Maria’s journey from the abbey to the fabulous, imposing Von Trapp mansion. Other set highlights included the Swastika-filled concert hall.
The other let-down of the initial scene was Connie Fisher’s singing. Shocking, I know, considering Fisher has been hailed as the second coming of Julie Andrews. But that was exactly the problem. Why the producers felt the need to so faithfully re-create Andrews’ iconic look for Fisher is quite beyond me.  However, Fisher was so drowned out in the title song that the audience had no choice but to look at the set.
Like the set though, Fisher’s singing suddenly improved as the show went on, resulting in fantastic renditions of songs such as The Lonely Goatherd and My Favourite Things. Her fellow leading artists were also highlights, including fabulous portrayals of Captain Von Trapp, The Mother Abbess and Elsa Schraeder by Michael Praed, Marilyn Hill Smith and Jacinta Mulcahy respectively. My personal cast highlight though was Martin Callaghan as Max Detweiller. Callaghan created such a fully-formed character out of a part that has merely drifted by as a cameo in previous productions which such humour and confidence that he totally ‘stole the show’ from his counterparts.
Connie Fisher in The Sound of Music

The supporting cast were also surprisingly good. All 7 children were strong musically and dramatically and the chorus of nuns created a beautiful sound that carried through the theatre very powerfully.
The entire cast were supported well by the orchestra who played the remarkable new orchestrations by Robert Russell Bennett. Thankfully, the producers opted to include the love duet from the movie (Something Good) and not the stage show (An Ordinary Couple) although I must complain about how rushed some of the songs seemed. This song in particular with its marching bass line seemed to rush by like a locomotive.
It’s hard to review the core aspects of an age-old classic show like The Sound of Music without offending people. If one were to review it like a new musical, one would say (well, I certainly would say) that the music and lyrics are incredibly strong yet the book sometimes leaves something to be desired. Most people are familiar with the film, and the screenplay of the film has always been infinitely better than Lindsay & Crouse’s book for the stage show. A book that makes me feel embarrassed for the writers but also the actors who have to interpret it.
However, these aspects of the show, for me, were far outweighed by the brilliant performances and the endless appeal of The Sound of Music, a show that will live on.
4*

Tuesday 7 December 2010

Theatre Review – Love Never Dies (Adelphi Theatre, London 27th October 2010)

I wasn’t quite sure what to expect when I went to see Love Never Dies at the Adelphi Theatre. Was it going to be good or bad? How about the performances? Lloyd-Webber’s music? Of course, you could wonder like this about many new musicals, but this seems to specifically apply to Love Never Dies. So much hype has surrounded this show since it was first announced at Her Majesty’s Theatre (home to The Phantom of the Opera) just over a year ago that many people have said this show is marvellous, many (including hate group Love Should Die) have said that this show is the worst thing to hit the West-End in years and it will be and deserves to be a flop.
So, I went in with an open mind. The first thing that entered my mind was that the Adelphi is one of the ugliest theatres I have ever been in. I ignored this and hoped the show wouldn’t be the same. My worries were not easily silenced though – the show opens with a prologue of dialogue. The scripting and staging of this scene happens to be some of the worst I’ve ever seen. Discomforting? You bet. Any sense of discomfort disappeared, however, as the first bars of The Coney Island Waltz were heard. This beautiful waltz then replays the story of Phantasma, and Mr. Y (the new name of The Phantom) and Christine. This scene is achieved by some of the most incredible digital animations I have ever seen. At this point, we are immediately introduced to an extremely energetic chorus of singers and dancers who perform with dedication and focus to help construct the huge theatrical picture that is Love Never Dies.
In addition to the fantastic ensemble, Love Never Dies has some of the finest leading artists I have ever seen. Ramin Karimloo and Sierra Boggess have a unique chemistry onstage. This chemistry clearly figured as one of the main reasons for their being cast together. This and the fact that they are arguably the best singers currently in the West-End. They are both young, attractive and great performers. The supporting cast (including Summer Strallen as Meg Giry, Joseph Millson as Raoul and Liz Robertson as Mme. Giry) were equally as strong. They created believable, charismatic characters and worked well together, establishing the Company of Love Never Dies as one that blends well together.
Summer Strallen and the "Ooh-La-La Girls"

As mentioned before, any doubts about Andrew Lloyd-Webber’s score were soon removed after the first bars were played (by the glorious orchestra). As the show went on, the sounds coming out of the orchestra pit turned out to be the lush melodies we have come to expect from the composer. Along with great arias (‘Til I Hear You Sing, Why Does She Love Me?) there are fantastic duets (Devil Take the Hindmost, Look with your Heart) and ensemble pieces (Bathing Beauty). The title song, performed by Sierra Boggess is simply one of the greatest things I have ever seen on stage, a scene I felt privileged to watch.
The score and the performances are the two strongest points of the show. As with most shows (if not all) there are weak points. One part of the show, which did not live up to the rest were the lyrics. Glenn Slater has been quite a trustworthy lyric-writer in the past (see Sister Act). But with rhymes such as “father/bother” and cringe-worthy lyrics like “Love gives you pleasure and love brings you pain” and “Love never dies, once it is in you.” It is apparent his penchant is not for sweeping, romantic lyrics on a par to Lloyd-Webber’s music.
Another weak part of the show was much of Jack O’Brien’s direction. A lot of it felt as if it belonged in a bad amateur production, and much of the direction felt wasted on the brilliant performers O’Brien had the use of. On this note however, Jerry Mitchell’s choreography was very effective, and brilliantly complimented the scenery and music in a way that the direction did not manage.

Ramin Karimloo and Sierra Boggess as 'The Phantom' and 'Christine'

Paule Constable’s lighting design brilliantly lit Bob Crowley’s beautiful set and costumes (which included a hot air balloon and a giant gorilla) which did manage to detract the attention away from the disappointing lyrics, direction and book.
The joy of seeing this show was knowing that parts of it were brilliant, and the parts that weren’t were the parts that could be easily fixed. And that is exactly what has happened. In the time it has taken me to write this review, the show has temporarily closed, been re-worked and re-opened. I look forward to seeing the second version of Love Never Dies, one of the best musicals I’ve ever seen, and the finest theatrical score of the last decade.
4*